Formula 1 Azerbaijan GP
Why is everyone so angry at McLaren after Monza?
McLaren was criticised for its Italian GP team orders call, and the key points of irritation for many open up further philosophical questions about the right way to do things in F1...
Jake Boxall-Legge
Edited: Sep 15, 2025, 12:19 PM
Copy link
Share on Viber
By the time the Azerbaijan Grand Prix has been and gone, commenters in Formula 1 will have found something else to poke fun at, or become incensed by, as the Monza affair fades into obscurity.
McLaren's enforced swap between Lando Norris and Oscar Piastri became the subject of memes, ire, and light mockery as the team restored the order between its drivers to what it was before its pitstops, as Norris lost time with a slow stop. It felt reasonably obvious that McLaren would do that and, despite Piastri's protestations that slow stops counted as racing, he duly acquiesced to the command.
Quite a few people lost their minds about it, even if - as team principal Andrea Stella maintained - the team felt it was fair.
Much of the uproariousness over the swap seemed to hinge on the idea that, actually, it was inherently unfair; it was disadvantaging Piastri for reasons outside of his control. But one might argue that, if the team wants to provide an absolutely fair and equal environment, it should do so to cancel out disadvantaging Norris as well. But is the literal interpretation of fair...actually fair?
It depends on your point of view, and McLaren's seemed to be that a mistake from its pitcrew was less fair on one driver than the other.
The 2024 Hungarian Grand Prix had played out somewhat similarly in that Piastri took the lead from Norris, Norris reclaimed it from an unexpected undercut, having pitted to cover off Lewis Hamilton, and was reluctant to give it up. Eventually, he let Piastri pass for his maiden F1 win.
Lando Norris, McLaren, Oscar Piastri, McLaren
Photo by: Andy Hone/ LAT Images via Getty Images
This could even be viewed as slightly more of a tenuous situation but, in that race, McLaren defined its principles. Monza was a continuation thereof, just in the other direction; Piastri's stop was timed to ensure Charles Leclerc was covered off completely, Norris came in after and the pitcrew snatched at his front-left wheel, and ended up emerging behind.
McLaren, of course, didn't intend that and wanted to revert positions. Afterwards the situation was the same as it was prior to the stops - but now with an intermission where Piastri had briefly run in second. This brought about a debate over object permanence, re-bottling genies, and re-canning worms - it was almost existentialist in nature.
Situations like that also precipitate debate over what's "right" in the world of motorsport. Did the situation of two wrongs make things right? Or was it a case of McLaren fighting against nature or chance to reverse the order?
There is something philosophical here: like opening Pandora's Box, perhaps, or finding that Schrodinger's cat was dead and had started to pong a bit. Does one open the box on team orders, contest moments construed to be unfair, and potentially leave the door open to consequence? Or do you let them play out naturally, and hope karmic justice is meted out by the cosmos?
To be honest, either is good. When you think about it in terms of the greatest philosophical theories, it all seems a bit insignificant.
Toto Wolff suggested that McLaren had set a 'dangerous precedent' with the team orders call, but actually, it had already done so in Hungary last year.
Weirdly, this year's Hungary race very much seemed like a free-for-all - perhaps the team really didn't think that Norris' strategy would work, although strategic variations have not been entirely uncommon at the team. The pack-shuffling only seems to extend to situations where the team intended to do something, and it didn't happen that way.
Oscar Piastri, McLaren
Photo by: Mark Thompson / Getty Images
It juxtaposes with F1's reputation for being a cut-throat environment - where people are stabbed in the back nine times before they've even had their morning coffee, and where scrupulousness very much pales in comparison to winning and success.
When McLaren comes in and decides it wants to build a culture of 'fairness and transparency', people view it with suspicion. It's not what people have in mind when they think of the dynamics of an F1 team; surely the ultra-competitive nature of the championship is not miscible with that sort of philosophy?
As such, many see that as McLaren trying to control the title race. Naturally, there will be certain fans on either side who claim that the team favours one driver over the other, and others who think McLaren is trying to engineer a final title showdown.
Given how both drivers are valued within the team, this is surely not the case. But further to that, Piastri is 31 points ahead, and surely the safe bet to win the title. As much as the memes decree it, McLaren isn't going to force Piastri to retire from a race to make up for Zandvoort...
But as we've already said, we'll have forgotten about it this time next week. We'll be angry about something else instead, because we're fickle humans.
Read Also:
Formula 1How McLaren can wrap up the 2025 F1 constructors' title in Azerbaijan GP
Formula 1McLaren might have opened Pandora’s box in Monza
We want your opinion!
What would you like to see on Motorsport.com?
Take our 5 minute survey.
- The Motorsport.com Team
Read and post comments
Read also :
Share Or Save This Story
Copy link
Share on Viber
Previous article Helmut Marko: Now everything is possible for Red Bull after F1 Italian GP "rebirth"
Next article Williams becomes Carlos Sainz's "life project" as he targets F1 revival
Top Comments
There are no comments at the moment. Would you like to write one?
View More & Comment
More from
Jake Boxall-Legge
Kimi Antonelli: "Weird" spin and car instability cost F1 Brazilian GP win
Formula 1
Formula 1
Sao Paulo GP
4 d
Kimi Antonelli: "Weird" spin and car instability cost F1 Brazilian GP win
More from
Lando Norris
F1 driver contracts: How long is each driver tied down for?
Formula 1
Formula 1 3 min
F1 driver contracts: How long is each driver tied down for?
More from
McLaren
What's behind Oscar Piastri's split with Mark Webber – and what it means for his F1 career
Formula 1
Formula 1
Sao Paulo GP
3 d
What's behind Oscar Piastri's split with Mark Webber – and what it means for his F1 career
Malthe Jakobsen completes McLaren's WEC Hypercar driver line-up
WEC
WEC 3 d
Malthe Jakobsen completes McLaren's WEC Hypercar driver line-up
Latest news
F1 driver contracts: How long is each driver tied down for?
Formula 1
F1 Formula 1 3 min
F1 driver contracts: How long is each driver tied down for?
IndyCar 2026 season review: ECR
IndyCar
Indy IndyCar 15 h
IndyCar 2026 season review: ECR
Toto Wolff reflects on Mercedes’ non-title years: ‘We weren’t complete losers’
Formula 1
F1 Formula 1
Sao Paulo GP
16 h
Toto Wolff reflects on Mercedes’ non-title years: ‘We weren’t complete losers’
Renger van der Zande moves to IMSA’s LMP2 class full-time with Tower Motorsports
IMSA
IMSA IMSA 16 h
Renger van der Zande moves to IMSA’s LMP2 class full-time with Tower Motorsports
Feature
Discover prime content
Top 10 F1 cars of the 1970s
Formula 1
By Kevin Turner
Top 10 F1 cars of the 1970s
Subscribe and access Motorsport.com with your ad-blocker.
From Formula 1 to MotoGP we report straight from the paddock because we love our sport, just like you. In order to keep delivering our expert journalism, our website uses advertising. Still, we want to give you the opportunity to enjoy an ad-free and tracker-free website and to continue using your adblocker.
You have 2 options:
- Become a subscriber.
- Disable your adblocker.
Subscribe now Already subscribed? Sign in here
Already disabled your adblocker?
Reload page
Manage Alerts
Subscribe